MDix
02-22 06:50 AM
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/download/Perm_FY2009_TEXT.zip.
Green Please :).
Thanks,
MDi
Green Please :).
Thanks,
MDi
wallpaper YUI has sweet voice and talent
alapkd
05-15 10:05 PM
Appreciate any help and legal advise.
preeyanka
02-09 01:36 PM
Hi,
I am a doctoral student in clinical psychology, graduating next year in May or October. I am currently on an F-1 student visa and have heard ominous things about getting an H1-b and GC in my field.
I know I have time and things can change, but it seems like they are becoming more difficult. Hence if there are people out there who have ideas, experiences and information to share about what the process is like for potential psychologists to get sponsored, I would greatly appreciate your reply.
thanks.
I am a doctoral student in clinical psychology, graduating next year in May or October. I am currently on an F-1 student visa and have heard ominous things about getting an H1-b and GC in my field.
I know I have time and things can change, but it seems like they are becoming more difficult. Hence if there are people out there who have ideas, experiences and information to share about what the process is like for potential psychologists to get sponsored, I would greatly appreciate your reply.
thanks.
2011 ＹＵＩ ＬＯＶＥ
Jithesh
05-25 12:14 AM
Hi,
I am here in US working for a company on L1 Visa. My Visa and I-94 expires on November 2010. The company has already applied for my H1. I am planning for a vacation to India in August. I have the following question,
1. When I comes back to US from my vacation, in September, I dont have to go to the consulate, as my L1 is still valid. And I wont be able to go to the consulate for H1 stamping, as they wouldnt have started the stamping for this year, right?
2. Once I am back in L1, do I have to go back to India for H1 stamping, as my L1 expires in November?
3. Or the best method is to visit India after October and get it stamped with H1 from the consulate while coming back from India?
Jithesh
I am here in US working for a company on L1 Visa. My Visa and I-94 expires on November 2010. The company has already applied for my H1. I am planning for a vacation to India in August. I have the following question,
1. When I comes back to US from my vacation, in September, I dont have to go to the consulate, as my L1 is still valid. And I wont be able to go to the consulate for H1 stamping, as they wouldnt have started the stamping for this year, right?
2. Once I am back in L1, do I have to go back to India for H1 stamping, as my L1 expires in November?
3. Or the best method is to visit India after October and get it stamped with H1 from the consulate while coming back from India?
Jithesh
more...
Blog Feeds
04-01 10:40 AM
Bolivian immigrant Jaime Escalante, the inspiration for the calculus teacher portrayed by Edward James Olmos in the film Stand and Deliver passed away yesterday at the age of 79. Escalante taught disadvantaged inner city Latino high school students in Los Angeles and was known for his innovative teaching techniques. And he produced some highly impressive results. According to the NY Times: Mr. Escalante, a Bolivian immigrant, used unconventional techniques to explain mathematical problems and to convince his students at James A. Garfield High School, known for its dismal test scores and high drop-out rate, that they could compete with students...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jaime-escalante-dies.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/04/jaime-escalante-dies.html)
kumar26fl
08-27 08:09 AM
Hi
We (my wife and I) applied for our EAD renewals. I got email 2 days back saying 'Card production ordered', but did not get a similar mail for my wife.
Is it normal to have applicant and dependent's timings for approvals on different dates? I was thikinkg that since we applied on the same date, and since my case is renewed, my wife's should also be renewed at the same time. Can I wait more or is this something a cause of concern?
Any suggestions please
Thanks
We (my wife and I) applied for our EAD renewals. I got email 2 days back saying 'Card production ordered', but did not get a similar mail for my wife.
Is it normal to have applicant and dependent's timings for approvals on different dates? I was thikinkg that since we applied on the same date, and since my case is renewed, my wife's should also be renewed at the same time. Can I wait more or is this something a cause of concern?
Any suggestions please
Thanks
more...
Macaca
06-05 07:40 PM
Discontent Over Iraq Increasing, Poll Finds (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/04/AR2007060401230.html) Americans Also Unhappy With Congress, By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/dan+balz+and+jon+cohen/), Washington Post Staff Writers, Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Growing frustration with the performance of the Democratic Congress, combined with widespread public pessimism over President Bush's temporary troop buildup in Iraq, has left satisfaction with the overall direction of the country at its lowest point in more than a decade, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Almost six in 10 Americans said they do not think the additional troops sent to Iraq since the beginning of the year will help restore civil order there, and 53 percent -- a new high in Post-ABC News polls -- said they do not believe that the war has contributed to the long-term security of the United States.
Disapproval of Bush's performance in office remains high, but the poll highlighted growing disapproval of the new Democratic majority in Congress. Just 39 percent said they approve of the job Congress is doing, down from 44 percent in April, when the new Congress was about 100 days into its term. More significant, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 10 percentage points over that same period, from 54 percent to 44 percent.
Much of that drop was fueled by lower approval ratings of the Democrats in Congress among strong opponents of the war, independents and liberal Democrats. While independents were evenly split on the Democrats in Congress in April (49 percent approved, 48 percent disapproved), now 37 percent said they approved and 54 percent disapproved. Among liberal Democrats, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 18 points.
Bush's overall job-approval rating stands at 35 percent, unchanged from April.
Many Democratic activists have complained that the 2006 midterm election results represented a call for a course change in Iraq and that so far the Democratic-controlled Congress has failed to deliver.
Deep public skepticism about Iraq, concerns about the Democrats and Bush, and near-record-high gasoline prices appear to have combined to sour the overall mood in the country. In the new poll, 73 percent of Americans said the country is pretty seriously on the wrong track, while 25 percent said things are going in the right direction.
That gap is marginally wider than it was at the beginning of the year and represents the most gloomy expression of public sentiment since January 1996, when a face-off between President Bill Clinton and a Republican-controlled Congress over the budget led to an extended shutdown of the federal government.
Among the nearly three-quarters of Americans expressing a pessimistic viewpoint, about one in five blamed the war for their negative outlook, and about the same ratio mentioned the economy, gas prices, jobs or debt as the main reason for their dissatisfaction with the country's direction. Eleven percent cited "problems with Bush," and another 11 percent said "everything" led them to their negative opinion.
The new poll showed that Americans have recalibrated their view of who is taking the lead in Washington. Earlier this year, majorities of Americans said they believed that the Democrats were taking the initiative in the capital, but now there is an even split, with 43 percent saying Bush is taking the stronger leadership role and 45 percent saying the Democrats are.
That shift occurred across the political spectrum. In April, 59 percent of independents said Democrats were taking a stronger role, but that figure has dropped 15 points, to 44 percent.
The political machinations over the Iraq war funding bill have been the dominant news event in Congress for much of the spring, and the Democrats' removal of the provision linking funding to a withdrawal deadline came shortly before the poll was taken.
In April, the public, by a 25-point margin, trusted the Democrats over Bush to handle the situation in Iraq. In this poll, Democrats maintained an advantage, but by 16 points. There has been an erosion of support for Democrats on this issue, but not a corresponding movement to Bush. Among independents, trust for the Democrats is down eight points, mostly because of a six-point bump in the percentage who said they trust "neither."
Congressional Democrats also are preferred over Bush -- whose own approval ratings remain near career lows -- on immigration (by 17 percentage points), the economy (by 18 points) and even, albeit narrowly, on handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism (by six points).
But it is the war in Iraq -- the most important issue in the 2006 campaign -- that has the most potential to reshape the political landscape.
Overall, 61 percent in this poll said the war was not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds said the United States is not making significant progress restoring civil order in Iraq. However, there is no such general agreement about what to do.
In this poll, 55 percent -- a new high -- said the number of U.S. military forces in Iraq should be decreased, but only 15 percent advocated an immediate withdrawal of American troops. An additional 12 percent said U.S. forces should be out of Iraq sometime this year.
Since the Iraqi parliamentary elections in November 2005, consistent majorities of Americans have said U.S. troops should be drawn down; support for an immediate, complete withdrawal has also remained relatively stable, never exceeding two in 10. And there similarly has been little change across party lines: 25 percent of the Democrats surveyed wanted all American military forces out of Iraq now, compared with 13 percent of independents and 6 percent of Republicans, with all percentages about the same as in late 2005. Support for the immediate removal of U.S. forces peaked at 32 percent among African Americans.
Public attitudes about the size of U.S. military forces in Iraq and about the war more generally are closely related to views about the centrality of the situation in Iraq to the broader battle against terrorism, another flashpoint between Bush and congressional Democrats. (In this poll, nearly six in 10 agreed with the Democratic position that the two are separate issues.) Overall, more than seven in 10 of those who said Iraq is an essential component of the terrorism fight wanted U.S. troop levels in Iraq to be increased or kept the same, while more than seven in 10 of those seeing the issues as separate thought that some or all troops should be withdrawn. Among independents who said the United States can succeed against terrorism without winning in Iraq, 70 percent supported decreasing troop levels, compared with 23 percent of those who saw victory in Iraq as pivotal.
This Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone May 29 to June 1 among a random sample of 1,205 adults. Results from the full poll have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. Sampling error margins are higher for subgroups.
Washington Post-ABC News Poll (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_060307.html)
The Washington Post - ABC News Poll: Iraq War Apprehension (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/06/05/GR2007060500108.html)
Growing frustration with the performance of the Democratic Congress, combined with widespread public pessimism over President Bush's temporary troop buildup in Iraq, has left satisfaction with the overall direction of the country at its lowest point in more than a decade, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Almost six in 10 Americans said they do not think the additional troops sent to Iraq since the beginning of the year will help restore civil order there, and 53 percent -- a new high in Post-ABC News polls -- said they do not believe that the war has contributed to the long-term security of the United States.
Disapproval of Bush's performance in office remains high, but the poll highlighted growing disapproval of the new Democratic majority in Congress. Just 39 percent said they approve of the job Congress is doing, down from 44 percent in April, when the new Congress was about 100 days into its term. More significant, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 10 percentage points over that same period, from 54 percent to 44 percent.
Much of that drop was fueled by lower approval ratings of the Democrats in Congress among strong opponents of the war, independents and liberal Democrats. While independents were evenly split on the Democrats in Congress in April (49 percent approved, 48 percent disapproved), now 37 percent said they approved and 54 percent disapproved. Among liberal Democrats, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 18 points.
Bush's overall job-approval rating stands at 35 percent, unchanged from April.
Many Democratic activists have complained that the 2006 midterm election results represented a call for a course change in Iraq and that so far the Democratic-controlled Congress has failed to deliver.
Deep public skepticism about Iraq, concerns about the Democrats and Bush, and near-record-high gasoline prices appear to have combined to sour the overall mood in the country. In the new poll, 73 percent of Americans said the country is pretty seriously on the wrong track, while 25 percent said things are going in the right direction.
That gap is marginally wider than it was at the beginning of the year and represents the most gloomy expression of public sentiment since January 1996, when a face-off between President Bill Clinton and a Republican-controlled Congress over the budget led to an extended shutdown of the federal government.
Among the nearly three-quarters of Americans expressing a pessimistic viewpoint, about one in five blamed the war for their negative outlook, and about the same ratio mentioned the economy, gas prices, jobs or debt as the main reason for their dissatisfaction with the country's direction. Eleven percent cited "problems with Bush," and another 11 percent said "everything" led them to their negative opinion.
The new poll showed that Americans have recalibrated their view of who is taking the lead in Washington. Earlier this year, majorities of Americans said they believed that the Democrats were taking the initiative in the capital, but now there is an even split, with 43 percent saying Bush is taking the stronger leadership role and 45 percent saying the Democrats are.
That shift occurred across the political spectrum. In April, 59 percent of independents said Democrats were taking a stronger role, but that figure has dropped 15 points, to 44 percent.
The political machinations over the Iraq war funding bill have been the dominant news event in Congress for much of the spring, and the Democrats' removal of the provision linking funding to a withdrawal deadline came shortly before the poll was taken.
In April, the public, by a 25-point margin, trusted the Democrats over Bush to handle the situation in Iraq. In this poll, Democrats maintained an advantage, but by 16 points. There has been an erosion of support for Democrats on this issue, but not a corresponding movement to Bush. Among independents, trust for the Democrats is down eight points, mostly because of a six-point bump in the percentage who said they trust "neither."
Congressional Democrats also are preferred over Bush -- whose own approval ratings remain near career lows -- on immigration (by 17 percentage points), the economy (by 18 points) and even, albeit narrowly, on handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism (by six points).
But it is the war in Iraq -- the most important issue in the 2006 campaign -- that has the most potential to reshape the political landscape.
Overall, 61 percent in this poll said the war was not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds said the United States is not making significant progress restoring civil order in Iraq. However, there is no such general agreement about what to do.
In this poll, 55 percent -- a new high -- said the number of U.S. military forces in Iraq should be decreased, but only 15 percent advocated an immediate withdrawal of American troops. An additional 12 percent said U.S. forces should be out of Iraq sometime this year.
Since the Iraqi parliamentary elections in November 2005, consistent majorities of Americans have said U.S. troops should be drawn down; support for an immediate, complete withdrawal has also remained relatively stable, never exceeding two in 10. And there similarly has been little change across party lines: 25 percent of the Democrats surveyed wanted all American military forces out of Iraq now, compared with 13 percent of independents and 6 percent of Republicans, with all percentages about the same as in late 2005. Support for the immediate removal of U.S. forces peaked at 32 percent among African Americans.
Public attitudes about the size of U.S. military forces in Iraq and about the war more generally are closely related to views about the centrality of the situation in Iraq to the broader battle against terrorism, another flashpoint between Bush and congressional Democrats. (In this poll, nearly six in 10 agreed with the Democratic position that the two are separate issues.) Overall, more than seven in 10 of those who said Iraq is an essential component of the terrorism fight wanted U.S. troop levels in Iraq to be increased or kept the same, while more than seven in 10 of those seeing the issues as separate thought that some or all troops should be withdrawn. Among independents who said the United States can succeed against terrorism without winning in Iraq, 70 percent supported decreasing troop levels, compared with 23 percent of those who saw victory in Iraq as pivotal.
This Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone May 29 to June 1 among a random sample of 1,205 adults. Results from the full poll have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. Sampling error margins are higher for subgroups.
Washington Post-ABC News Poll (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_060307.html)
The Washington Post - ABC News Poll: Iraq War Apprehension (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/06/05/GR2007060500108.html)
2010 YUI LOVE amp; TRUTH (YUI version)
G
01-25 08:25 AM
I just started my first real site for a local jaguar showroom but I'm looking for more work for a portfolio site I'm working on.
My skills include:-
HTML (advanced)
Javascript (intermediate)
PHP (intermediate)
Flash (intermediate)
Photoshop (intermediate)
Swift 3D (intermediate)
Illustrator (intermediate)
Corel Draw (intermediate)
Please send me an email if you are interested - g_barnettuk@hotmail.com
My skills include:-
HTML (advanced)
Javascript (intermediate)
PHP (intermediate)
Flash (intermediate)
Photoshop (intermediate)
Swift 3D (intermediate)
Illustrator (intermediate)
Corel Draw (intermediate)
Please send me an email if you are interested - g_barnettuk@hotmail.com
more...
ganguteli
03-23 12:19 PM
Google is your best friend
hair LOVE amp; TRUTH ～YUI Acoustic
reachtoravi
01-17 02:45 PM
I want to change my recurring contribution to my new shining miles card ...
is there an easy way to do this ??
is there an easy way to do this ??
more...
kittu1991
06-19 08:42 PM
I have a question. I heard about new premium processing rule for 140.
my friend�s six years is going to complete in next month , he has applied labour certification via PARM 10 months back and its pending, did he is eligible to file 140? Or he has to live next month?
Your friend cannot apply for I140 without approved labour. I don't know what other provision he has to be in status. May be he can try to recpture the vaccation time. If he has atleast 2 months of vaccation time, don't know if he can apply for 7th yr extension based on 365 days rule.
my friend�s six years is going to complete in next month , he has applied labour certification via PARM 10 months back and its pending, did he is eligible to file 140? Or he has to live next month?
Your friend cannot apply for I140 without approved labour. I don't know what other provision he has to be in status. May be he can try to recpture the vaccation time. If he has atleast 2 months of vaccation time, don't know if he can apply for 7th yr extension based on 365 days rule.
hot LOVE amp; TRUTH ～YUI Acoustic
vinay.shah73
10-24 02:59 AM
Forgot to mention that my I-140 was also approved in Jan 2007. This was not a concurrent filing. I filed I-485 after getting I-140 approved.
more...
house 『LOVE amp; TRUTH』 『Namidairo』
chanduv23
11-25 06:07 PM
Dear Members, please join your State Chapters. A lot of activities are being planned and organized.
tattoo Yui - Love an Truth
luckydog
10-09 08:14 PM
Are you one of the �Faces of America (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD)�?
USCIS wants to hear your story!
Each of us has an immigration story to tell. Many Americans can relate a unique journey to citizenship made by ourselves or by our families before us. It is important for every American to recognize those who have made great sacrifices to become American citizens and how their unique contributions have greatly enriched our nation.
The Faces of America section of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services website allows you the opportunity to share your immigration story with the nation. Please fill out the information below and tell us your story.
Please click here to participate: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD
USCIS wants to hear your story!
Each of us has an immigration story to tell. Many Americans can relate a unique journey to citizenship made by ourselves or by our families before us. It is important for every American to recognize those who have made great sacrifices to become American citizens and how their unique contributions have greatly enriched our nation.
The Faces of America section of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services website allows you the opportunity to share your immigration story with the nation. Please fill out the information below and tell us your story.
Please click here to participate: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.d753808ed0b23b5a64bc77ce843f6d1a/?vgnextoid=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1RCR D&vgnextchannel=41a363074864d010VgnVCM10000048f3d6a1 RCRD
more...
pictures love n truth summer song
bluekayal
02-07 06:34 PM
I just spoke with Chris Nutall of FT who did the interview with Craig Barrett. I've also forwarded Berkeleybee's newest IV ppt and the IV flyer to him.
dresses LOVE amp; TRUTH~Instrumental~
sac-r-ten
12-23 12:12 PM
ironically silent follower became vocal after the wait-is-over.
congrats buddy. i think you should wait for few more days, the way USCIS works you might have your Cards and then a welcome notice following it. LOL.
enjoy the holidays....
congrats buddy. i think you should wait for few more days, the way USCIS works you might have your Cards and then a welcome notice following it. LOL.
enjoy the holidays....
more...
makeup LOVE amp; TRUTH - YUI - MUSIC
GCisLottery
12-28 09:14 AM
http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/17444res20040528.html
If government agents question you, it is important to understand your rights. You should be careful in the way you speak when approached by the police, FBI, or INS. If you give answers, they can be used against you in a criminal, immigration, or civil case.
The ACLU's Know Your Rights brochure provides effective and useful guidance in a user-friendly question and answer format. The brochure apprises you of your legal rights, recommends how to preserve those rights, and provides guidance on how to interact with officials.
(Link via AILA)
If government agents question you, it is important to understand your rights. You should be careful in the way you speak when approached by the police, FBI, or INS. If you give answers, they can be used against you in a criminal, immigration, or civil case.
The ACLU's Know Your Rights brochure provides effective and useful guidance in a user-friendly question and answer format. The brochure apprises you of your legal rights, recommends how to preserve those rights, and provides guidance on how to interact with officials.
(Link via AILA)
girlfriend YUI - LOVE amp; TRUTH
Blog Feeds
09-14 10:10 AM
Most people know the story of this famous Austrian family that was the subject of the musical play and film The Sound of Music. Many may not realize that after the family fled Austria, they immigrated to the United States and brought their singing talent to American audiences. They also opened a lodge in Vermont that operates to this day. Father George and mother Maria passed on many years ago, but some of the children of that large family are still with us. Oldest daughter Agatha is now 96, but just a few years ago wrote a biography. Her sister...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/immigrants-of-the-day-the-von-trapp-family-singers.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/immigrants-of-the-day-the-von-trapp-family-singers.html)
hairstyles LOVE amp; TRUTH ～YUI Acoustic
pani_6
09-22 09:20 AM
News letter to members is a good first step...I would suggest a news letter every week with just fund rising and also increasing memebership in mind .The wording should be tuned towards rising $$.You can put on big bold wordings at the top % met versus our target..
Keep rowing guys we are almost there!!
Also..somebody with good writing skills write 1/2 page letter..about 8 different formats and wordings...so we can print them out and gives us a list of senators address...each member can spend 37 cents...even better fedex these to senators asking for support on the Skil Bill...
Great Job IV team
Keep rowing guys we are almost there!!
Also..somebody with good writing skills write 1/2 page letter..about 8 different formats and wordings...so we can print them out and gives us a list of senators address...each member can spend 37 cents...even better fedex these to senators asking for support on the Skil Bill...
Great Job IV team
Eternal_Hope
04-16 03:35 PM
Hi - I am just wondering, if Medical residency applications are subject to the yearly 65,000 Quota? Does anyone know?
If the hospital (healthcare organization) is a non-profit body then they will not be subjected to the quota (I think). Maybe other members can validate this.
If the hospital (healthcare organization) is a non-profit body then they will not be subjected to the quota (I think). Maybe other members can validate this.
rskreddy
04-21 09:19 AM
Hi,
I have a valid Visa from Employer A till May 2012. I moved to a new Employer B in Feb 2010 and my H1B was approved till Jan 2013.
I am planning to Visit India in June 2010. Can i come back to US, New Jersey with my Old Employer Visa and New Employer I797.
Thanks for your help.
I have a valid Visa from Employer A till May 2012. I moved to a new Employer B in Feb 2010 and my H1B was approved till Jan 2013.
I am planning to Visit India in June 2010. Can i come back to US, New Jersey with my Old Employer Visa and New Employer I797.
Thanks for your help.
No comments:
Post a Comment