svam77
09-23 05:59 PM
Hello All,
My checks got deposited on Friday and when I checked my wife's I 485 status with the LIN # on the back of the check, it said that the finger printing fee was rejected and that the case is now in suspense.
It said that I have to submit a new fee and that the case will be resumed again.
Do you know why this happened. My bank statement says that the finger printing check for her got deposited.
So if there is a mistake in the check, would they still deposit it ? And would her EAD application get processed even if the finger printing fee is wrong ?
Did this happen for anyone ?
Sam
My checks got deposited on Friday and when I checked my wife's I 485 status with the LIN # on the back of the check, it said that the finger printing fee was rejected and that the case is now in suspense.
It said that I have to submit a new fee and that the case will be resumed again.
Do you know why this happened. My bank statement says that the finger printing check for her got deposited.
So if there is a mistake in the check, would they still deposit it ? And would her EAD application get processed even if the finger printing fee is wrong ?
Did this happen for anyone ?
Sam
wallpaper Motorola Xoom, Motorola Atrix,
lecter
April 18th, 2008, 03:34 AM
Was with a bunch of D3 users!!
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
Nice machine. They were taking images long after the 1Ds and 1D "3"s gave up in the light....
Will be interesting to see how they deal with the noise.
Rob
srarao
09-29 11:48 AM
Hi
I am July 2nd filer at NSC.
I got my EAD approved from NSC on 25th. I see a message-- card ordered. Today there is one LUD , approval notice sent.
Is this common
---
Contributed $150 so far
I am July 2nd filer at NSC.
I got my EAD approved from NSC on 25th. I see a message-- card ordered. Today there is one LUD , approval notice sent.
Is this common
---
Contributed $150 so far
2011 In short, the Motorola HD Dock
sertasheep
03-10 11:52 AM
We were able to field questions 101 through 116 in today's conference call.
Questions 117 - 126 will be on the backburner in lieu of new questions received for the next conference call, as some of you may have sought opinion elsewhere. If you would like us to reconsider these questions, please email us again at legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org
Please send new questions to the above email address(legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org), and wait for a question ID to be assigned. You will then receive a confirmation email stating your question has been considered.
We intend to have the next free legal advice conference call in the next couple of weeks (Saturdays)
For those of you that may want to engage Susan Henner for EB-related immigration advice, she can be reached at the following address to schedule appointments for consultation:
75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor
White Plains, New York 10601
Telephone: 914-304-4078
Fax: 914-304-4079
Questions 117 - 126 will be on the backburner in lieu of new questions received for the next conference call, as some of you may have sought opinion elsewhere. If you would like us to reconsider these questions, please email us again at legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org
Please send new questions to the above email address(legal_advise@immigrationvoice.org), and wait for a question ID to be assigned. You will then receive a confirmation email stating your question has been considered.
We intend to have the next free legal advice conference call in the next couple of weeks (Saturdays)
For those of you that may want to engage Susan Henner for EB-related immigration advice, she can be reached at the following address to schedule appointments for consultation:
75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor
White Plains, New York 10601
Telephone: 914-304-4078
Fax: 914-304-4079
more...
fetch_gc
09-05 05:08 PM
No receipts for 485 pkg to NSC on July 16th,2007 at 11.16 am, signed by F.HEINAUER
Anybody in th same boat??
Thx
FETCH_GC
Anybody in th same boat??
Thx
FETCH_GC
TheCanadian
03-14 02:49 AM
Damn, that's good for fingerprinting.
more...
JunRN
05-14 08:00 PM
It depends. It may become 'U" but if your application is already 'pre-allocated a visa' during June, then you may still get some news in July.
But I do believe it will not become 'U' in July. Maybe in August and September it will become 'U'.
But I do believe it will not become 'U' in July. Maybe in August and September it will become 'U'.
2010 Atrix with the laptop dock
panks
06-30 01:20 PM
Hello All,
I am in my 10th year of H1B visa. (GC in process). Every other time I went to INDIA , I got my stamping in INDIA except in 2009 when I returned on Advanced Parole because of a lack of time. Now I need to go to INDIA again in July and I observed this condition for visa stamping at INDIAN consulates which is :
Have the same class of U.S. visa which is still valid or that has expired less than 12 months from the scheduled date of interview.
Wish to apply for the same visa class (e.g. had an H1 work visa, now applying again for an H1 work visa)
My question is whether my last entry to US on Advanced Parole will be interpreted as not having the same class of VISA. After I entered on AP , I did renew my H1 Visa and it is valid upto April'2011.
Thanks in advance
I am in my 10th year of H1B visa. (GC in process). Every other time I went to INDIA , I got my stamping in INDIA except in 2009 when I returned on Advanced Parole because of a lack of time. Now I need to go to INDIA again in July and I observed this condition for visa stamping at INDIAN consulates which is :
Have the same class of U.S. visa which is still valid or that has expired less than 12 months from the scheduled date of interview.
Wish to apply for the same visa class (e.g. had an H1 work visa, now applying again for an H1 work visa)
My question is whether my last entry to US on Advanced Parole will be interpreted as not having the same class of VISA. After I entered on AP , I did renew my H1 Visa and it is valid upto April'2011.
Thanks in advance
more...
Blog Feeds
08-25 07:10 PM
From its passage in 2002 until now, the USCIS has never issued so much as a memo explaining how it interprets the "automatic conversion" clause of the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA). They left it to the Board of Immigation Appeals (BIA) to explain this in Matter of Wang in 2009. The USCIS argued that the clause be interpreted in the most restrictive way possible, and surprisingly, the Board bought their argument. However, Matter of Wang may have a short shelf life, and here's why: 1) The �Administrative Delays� Fallacy In Matter of Wang, the Board states that �we find...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/08/why-matter-of-wang-got-it-wrong-four-fallacies.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/08/why-matter-of-wang-got-it-wrong-four-fallacies.html)
hair the Motorola Atrix 4G,
Raj2006
06-07 04:04 PM
got CPO emails and text messages for both cases. its approved in 42 days, no biometrics. thanks.
more...
ragz4u
01-24 04:11 PM
610-955-8290
phillyag
his email id is black_logs@yahoo.com
phillyag
his email id is black_logs@yahoo.com
hot Motorola Atrix 4G Dock Hands
zonezo786
05-02 12:15 AM
You must have at least two years of post-baccalaureate experience in a high-tech field to be eligible for an H1-b visa, or else have a masters or higher degree. So where did you get your experience? Are you still back in your own country? Working? Or did you just get your bachelor's in the US and are still in the US,
more...
house Motorola Atrix 4G laptop dock
anilkumar0902
04-17 08:32 PM
I e-filed my EAD renewal application along with my wife's EAD application on 03/16 and both were approved on 04/07. We both have sequential receipt #s.
However, we received my wife's EAD on 04/12 but not mine. I am the primary application of 485.
Does this happen often ?
However, we received my wife's EAD on 04/12 but not mine. I am the primary application of 485.
Does this happen often ?
tattoo Motorola#39;s dual core Atrix
sundar99
04-21 04:54 PM
My friend mentioned
Two of the immigrants spoke on their success, one is entrueprener in Nano tech who studied in US and also opened his company !, another is a student...
overall - it was a pretty interesting one.
Two of the immigrants spoke on their success, one is entrueprener in Nano tech who studied in US and also opened his company !, another is a student...
overall - it was a pretty interesting one.
more...
pictures Motorola Atrix 4G Laptop Dock
stlus
06-15 02:43 PM
Hi
I have applied for I-140 thro Substitute in March 2006(15 months ago) and I got a query on my education and company financial status in August 06 and attorney replied back to query in the month of October 2006.
When I check my status online shows as "we received your application on October 20th 2006 and in process".
Last month there was an updated date on 05/25/07 on my case and when i checked with employer, he says we have not yet received any information from USCIS to attorney.
Now the attorney says, we will be Re-filing my case, as one case got denial from my company (Not mine itseems). So that we will get new Receipt Number as I have only 8 Months left on my H1 and we can apply for 1 year extension meanwhile before 6 months of H1 expiry.
Is it a good idea to re-file I-140 from the same Service Center(NSC)?
or Can I apply in PERM now as I have only 8 months on my H1.
Pl. suggest.
I have applied for I-140 thro Substitute in March 2006(15 months ago) and I got a query on my education and company financial status in August 06 and attorney replied back to query in the month of October 2006.
When I check my status online shows as "we received your application on October 20th 2006 and in process".
Last month there was an updated date on 05/25/07 on my case and when i checked with employer, he says we have not yet received any information from USCIS to attorney.
Now the attorney says, we will be Re-filing my case, as one case got denial from my company (Not mine itseems). So that we will get new Receipt Number as I have only 8 Months left on my H1 and we can apply for 1 year extension meanwhile before 6 months of H1 expiry.
Is it a good idea to re-file I-140 from the same Service Center(NSC)?
or Can I apply in PERM now as I have only 8 months on my H1.
Pl. suggest.
dresses The Motorola Atrix 4G is as
desi3933
08-26 05:01 PM
I got my H1 approved in Oct 2004 and it was from Oct 2004 - Oct 2007. I used only 6 months of H1 and later went on TN (work visa for Canadian citizens) and remained in US working on TN for 4 years. I was in US all these years. Now even the earlier H1 approval duration is over, Can I apply for H1 with another employer using the old 2004 H1 quota cap or it has to be under new 2009 cap? Thanks in advance.
Your H1 is NOT subject to cap as you had H1 in last 6 years.
________________
Not a legal advise.
Your H1 is NOT subject to cap as you had H1 in last 6 years.
________________
Not a legal advise.
more...
makeup The dock has three USB ports
nashim
08-07 10:06 AM
Problem is with over visa time stay not for not using
girlfriend The Motorola Atrix laptop dock
boldm28
06-13 10:41 AM
When to expect EAD /AP if I had filed my EAD/485/ on June 10
PD being current
I know it takes 3 months but with this kinda mass filing I want to know the date to make some decisions
thanks
Bol
PD being current
I know it takes 3 months but with this kinda mass filing I want to know the date to make some decisions
thanks
Bol
hairstyles The Motorola Lapdock for the
Macaca
07-20 07:56 AM
Breakdown in Relations in the Senate Hobbles Its Ability to Get Things Done (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/20/washington/20cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/gst/emailus.html) New York Times, July 20, 2007
WASHINGTON, July 19 � Arlen Specter is a senior United States senator who expects to be allowed his say on the Senate floor. So he bristled when Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, brusquely cut him off at the end of the Iraq debate.
�The leadership is setting a dictatorial tone,� Mr. Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said Thursday, still furious over his treatment the day before. �Senators didn�t get here to be pushed around.�
It may seem small-minded to bicker over a few words at the end of a 24-hour debate. But the clash between the two veteran senators is evidence of a larger breakdown in relations in the Senate, a deterioration in cooperation that is hobbling the Senate�s ability to get things done. The situation is not likely to improve with a presidential election on the horizon.
As the cots were rolled away and lawmakers left for a decent night�s rest after the around-the-clock debate that ended � like others this year � in stalemate, lawmakers of both parties said they had rarely seen the tone so poisonous and the willingness to work together on the floor at such a low ebb.
�The last vestiges of courtesy seem to be going out the window,� said Senator Trent Lott, the Mississippi Republican who has served as majority and minority leader. �Every time I think the Senate � Republican or Democrat � has gone to a point where you can�t go any lower, we go lower.�
It is hardly startling that members of the two parties do not see eye to eye. And the spirit of bipartisanship in the Senate always rises and falls depending on the subject and the election calendar. But seven months into the new Democratic regime, the environment seems unusually hostile. Occasionally, senators do, too, as exhibited in a Sunday television exchange between Senators Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, and Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, that looked for a moment as if it might turn physical as the two men argued about the war in Iraq.
The angry attacks nearly spiraled out of control Thursday night as the two parties lobbed political bombs at each other during the windup of work on an otherwise popular higher education measure.
After Republicans brought forward proposals intended to embarrass Democrats on terror detainees and union elections, Democrats countered with a resolution urging President Bush not to pardon I. Lewis Libby Jr., a former top White House aide. Republicans struck back with a resolution deploring the pardons issued by President Bill Clinton.
The floor descended into chaos as members of the two parties glowered at one another across the aisle. Evidently recognizing they had gone too far, party leaders pulled back and agreed to try to finish the education bill as Democrats struck their Libby proposal from the record.
Hard feelings have consequences. Without agreements between the leaders of the opposing parties, the Senate has been plunged into a procedural knife fight, with Democrats forced to scramble to find 60 votes not just on contentious issues like an Iraq withdrawal plan, but on once-routine matters like motions to proceed to a spending bill.
The feuding has spilled into subjects that would seem to hold the potential for common ground, like antiterror legislation and lobbying reform, and will doubtless tie up other measures to come.
Democrats contend that Republicans have embarked on a strategy of delay, using Senate rules to chew up scarce legislative time and deny Democrats any accomplishments. Republicans complain that Democrats are trying to jam through objectionable bills and are mainly interested in building a political case for 2008. The relationship between Mr. Reid and his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has cooled after it was initially thought the two Senate tacticians would be able to do business.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has been in the Senate for more than four decades, said he was not sure bipartisanship was at an all-time low, but acknowledged things were tense.
�The fact the Senate is so evenly divided makes big causes out of smaller events,� Mr. Kennedy said.
Besides the narrow 51-49 majority Democrats enjoy, lawmakers and others attribute what senators deplore as a lack of comity to various reasons, including the emotions surrounding the Iraq war debate, a Republican payback for Democratic stalling in recent years and pure political maneuvering in a hot-house environment.
Mr. Reid on Thursday blamed Republican ideology, saying the Senate�s conservative contingent was unwilling to swallow legislation sought by most Americans.
�Republicans in the Senate do not represent mainstream Republicans around the country,� he said.
Members of both houses have been contending for years that the sort of personal interaction that can lead lawmakers to overcome partisan differences has been on the decline, leaving Congress polarized.
But Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Specter and others say they find that committee leaders still tend to be able to work together. And a bipartisan group of senior lawmakers put together the Senate�s immigration proposal, though it went down in flames to the broader political divide in Congress.
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee who has been in the heat of the battle over the Iraq legislation, said he did not believe feelings were frayed beyond repair.
�The Senate is a unique place where wills are tested, and this was a very important issue that people have very strong feelings on,� he said, referring to the Iraq debate. �Instead of fighting over it physically, there are battles that are fought on the floor of the Senate. But these are important disagreements and they should be aired.
�Isn�t that what we are here for?�
WASHINGTON, July 19 � Arlen Specter is a senior United States senator who expects to be allowed his say on the Senate floor. So he bristled when Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, brusquely cut him off at the end of the Iraq debate.
�The leadership is setting a dictatorial tone,� Mr. Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said Thursday, still furious over his treatment the day before. �Senators didn�t get here to be pushed around.�
It may seem small-minded to bicker over a few words at the end of a 24-hour debate. But the clash between the two veteran senators is evidence of a larger breakdown in relations in the Senate, a deterioration in cooperation that is hobbling the Senate�s ability to get things done. The situation is not likely to improve with a presidential election on the horizon.
As the cots were rolled away and lawmakers left for a decent night�s rest after the around-the-clock debate that ended � like others this year � in stalemate, lawmakers of both parties said they had rarely seen the tone so poisonous and the willingness to work together on the floor at such a low ebb.
�The last vestiges of courtesy seem to be going out the window,� said Senator Trent Lott, the Mississippi Republican who has served as majority and minority leader. �Every time I think the Senate � Republican or Democrat � has gone to a point where you can�t go any lower, we go lower.�
It is hardly startling that members of the two parties do not see eye to eye. And the spirit of bipartisanship in the Senate always rises and falls depending on the subject and the election calendar. But seven months into the new Democratic regime, the environment seems unusually hostile. Occasionally, senators do, too, as exhibited in a Sunday television exchange between Senators Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, and Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, that looked for a moment as if it might turn physical as the two men argued about the war in Iraq.
The angry attacks nearly spiraled out of control Thursday night as the two parties lobbed political bombs at each other during the windup of work on an otherwise popular higher education measure.
After Republicans brought forward proposals intended to embarrass Democrats on terror detainees and union elections, Democrats countered with a resolution urging President Bush not to pardon I. Lewis Libby Jr., a former top White House aide. Republicans struck back with a resolution deploring the pardons issued by President Bill Clinton.
The floor descended into chaos as members of the two parties glowered at one another across the aisle. Evidently recognizing they had gone too far, party leaders pulled back and agreed to try to finish the education bill as Democrats struck their Libby proposal from the record.
Hard feelings have consequences. Without agreements between the leaders of the opposing parties, the Senate has been plunged into a procedural knife fight, with Democrats forced to scramble to find 60 votes not just on contentious issues like an Iraq withdrawal plan, but on once-routine matters like motions to proceed to a spending bill.
The feuding has spilled into subjects that would seem to hold the potential for common ground, like antiterror legislation and lobbying reform, and will doubtless tie up other measures to come.
Democrats contend that Republicans have embarked on a strategy of delay, using Senate rules to chew up scarce legislative time and deny Democrats any accomplishments. Republicans complain that Democrats are trying to jam through objectionable bills and are mainly interested in building a political case for 2008. The relationship between Mr. Reid and his Republican counterpart, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, has cooled after it was initially thought the two Senate tacticians would be able to do business.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has been in the Senate for more than four decades, said he was not sure bipartisanship was at an all-time low, but acknowledged things were tense.
�The fact the Senate is so evenly divided makes big causes out of smaller events,� Mr. Kennedy said.
Besides the narrow 51-49 majority Democrats enjoy, lawmakers and others attribute what senators deplore as a lack of comity to various reasons, including the emotions surrounding the Iraq war debate, a Republican payback for Democratic stalling in recent years and pure political maneuvering in a hot-house environment.
Mr. Reid on Thursday blamed Republican ideology, saying the Senate�s conservative contingent was unwilling to swallow legislation sought by most Americans.
�Republicans in the Senate do not represent mainstream Republicans around the country,� he said.
Members of both houses have been contending for years that the sort of personal interaction that can lead lawmakers to overcome partisan differences has been on the decline, leaving Congress polarized.
But Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Specter and others say they find that committee leaders still tend to be able to work together. And a bipartisan group of senior lawmakers put together the Senate�s immigration proposal, though it went down in flames to the broader political divide in Congress.
Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, the chairman of the Armed Services Committee who has been in the heat of the battle over the Iraq legislation, said he did not believe feelings were frayed beyond repair.
�The Senate is a unique place where wills are tested, and this was a very important issue that people have very strong feelings on,� he said, referring to the Iraq debate. �Instead of fighting over it physically, there are battles that are fought on the floor of the Senate. But these are important disagreements and they should be aired.
�Isn�t that what we are here for?�
icube
10-06 11:11 PM
Hi,
I have a custom attached property that i want to set using the ChangePropertyAction. How do i do that?
Thanks
I have a custom attached property that i want to set using the ChangePropertyAction. How do i do that?
Thanks
TexDBoy
07-21 09:57 PM
I was also doing my part-time when I went for Visa ... For 33, I did say "yes" and gave the University name.
Not sure if IO looked at it ... did not ask me any questions regarding that ...
Not sure if IO looked at it ... did not ask me any questions regarding that ...
No comments:
Post a Comment